(754) TREM-1-mediated modulation of innate immune response in acute and chronic inflammation: Effect of treatment timing and cell specificity on outcome
President and Principal Investigator SignaBlok, Inc., Massachusetts, United States
Disclosure(s):
Alexander Sigalov, PhD: No relevant disclosure to display
Introduction/Rationale: Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) is a promising target in inflammation-related diseases such as cancer, sepsis, acute lung injury (ALI) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). Myeloid cells, including neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages, may play dual roles in inflammation and diseases depending on the stage and context of the disease process. The aim of this study was to test my hypothesis that the outcome of TREM-1 blockade can be different depending on whether TREM-1 signaling is suppressed in all cells that express TREM-1 (pan-TREM-1 blockade) or only in specific cells (e.g., macrophage-restricted TREM-1 blockade).
Methods: Animal models of cancer, sepsis, ALI and PF were used to test ligand-independent TREM-1 inhibitory peptides GF9 and GA31 (the latter in a form of macrophage-targeted lipopeptide complexes, GA31-LPC) as pan-TREM-1 and macrophage-restricted TREM-1 inhibitors, respectively.
Results: In fully immunocompetent mice, macrophage-restricted but not pan-TREM-1 blockade overcomes pancreatic cancer (PC) resistance to PD-L1 blockade and synergizes with immunotherapy. In PC xenograft-bearing athymic nude mice, macrophage-restricted and pan-TREM-1 inhibitors both increase complete response rate and survival when combined with chemotherapy but exhibit opposing dependence on timing of treatment initiation. Pan-TREM-1 treatment is effective only when given with but not after chemotherapy. In contrast, macrophage-restricted TREM-1 treatment is effective only when given after but not together with chemotherapy. Critical dependence of the outcome on the type of TREM-1 inhibitor and treatment timing was also observed in animal models of sepsis and ALI but not PF.
Conclusion: In summary, this is the first direct evidence that pan-TREM-1 and macrophage-restricted TREM-1 blockades may differ in their therapeutic efficacy depending on the disease, timing of treatment initiation and the type and stage of inflammatory response.